Peer Review Policy

Journal of Curriculum Innovation and Assessment

Overview
JCIA is committed to publishing high-quality research in curriculum innovation, assessment methodologies, and educational practice. Peer review safeguards the academic quality, methodological accuracy, and ethical integrity of submissions. Manuscripts are evaluated under a double-blind peer review system.

Review Model: Blind Peer Review from 4 Experts in the field (2 Internal & 2 External)
Author Anonymity: Ensures unbiased review
Reviewer Anonymity: Protects reviewer independence

Peer Review Workflow

  1. Submission & Initial Editorial Screening

    • Scope alignment with curriculum and assessment research

    • Formatting compliance

    • Verification of ethical approvals

    • Plagiarism check

    Submissions failing these criteria may be desk-rejected.

  2. Reviewer Selection
    Reviewers selected based on:

    • Expertise in education, curriculum, or pedagogy

    • Research and publication record

    • No conflicts of interest

  3. Review Criteria
    Evaluation based on:

    • Originality and relevance to curriculum studies

    • Methodological soundness

    • Accuracy of data, findings, and analysis

    • Educational impact and applicability

    • Writing clarity

    • Ethical compliance

    Possible recommendations: Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, Reject

  4. Editorial Decision

    • Consolidated reviewer feedback provided

    • Clear decision letter with detailed comments

    • Revision timeline (2–4 weeks suggested)

⏳ Timeframe: Average review period is 4–6 weeks.

Reviewer Ethics & Responsibilities

  • Maintain manuscript confidentiality

  • Provide unbiased, constructive feedback

  • Declare conflicts of interest

  • Avoid sharing content or using data for personal gain

Appeals: Formal appeals can be submitted; final decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief.

⚖️ Ethical Standards & Compliance: COPE guidelines, HEC standards, and international best practices.

Reviewer Recognition: Annual listing, certificates, and editorial board invitations.

Conclusion: JCIA ensures all publications reflect ethical rigor, methodological accuracy, and practical relevance in education research.