Peer Review Policy

The International Review of Sustainable Economics and Finance (IRSEF) is committed to ensuring the publication of high-quality, original, and impactful research through a rigorous, fair, and transparent peer review process. The journal upholds the principles of academic integrity, objectivity, and confidentiality at every stage of review.

Review Model

IRSEF follows a double-blind peer review system, ensuring that:

  • The identities of authors and reviewers remain confidential

  • Manuscripts are evaluated solely on academic merit, originality, and relevance

Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent experts in the relevant field of economics, finance, or sustainability studies.


Initial Editorial Screening

Before being sent for peer review, all submissions undergo an initial evaluation by the editorial team to assess:

  • Alignment with the journal’s aims and scope

  • Compliance with author guidelines

  • Plagiarism screening (maximum similarity threshold of 19%)

Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be rejected without external review.


Reviewer Selection

Reviewers are selected based on:

  • Subject expertise in economics, finance, or sustainability

  • Academic qualifications and research experience

  • Absence of any conflict of interest

The editorial board ensures that reviewers provide unbiased, constructive, and confidential evaluations.


Review Criteria

Reviewers are requested to evaluate manuscripts based on:

  • Originality and contribution to sustainable economics and finance

  • Theoretical and methodological rigor

  • Relevance to current economic and financial challenges

  • Clarity, organization, and academic quality

  • Validity of data, analysis, and conclusions

Constructive feedback is encouraged to help authors improve the quality of their work.


Review Timeline

Reviewers are typically given 2–4 weeks to complete their evaluations. The editorial office strives to ensure efficient processing and timely communication with authors.


Editorial Decision

Based on reviewer reports, the Editor-in-Chief or handling editor may make one of the following decisions:

  • Accept

  • Minor Revisions

  • Major Revisions

  • Reject

Authors receive a detailed decision letter along with anonymized reviewer comments.


Revision Process

Authors are required to:

  • Address all reviewer comments thoroughly

  • Submit a revised manuscript within the specified timeframe

  • Provide a point-by-point response to reviewer feedback

Revised manuscripts may be returned to reviewers for further evaluation if necessary.


Confidentiality and Ethical Standards

  • All submitted manuscripts are treated as confidential documents

  • Reviewers must not use unpublished material for personal advantage

  • Any conflicts of interest must be disclosed immediately


Appeals Process

Authors may appeal editorial decisions by submitting a formal, well-justified request to the editorial office. Appeals are reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief and, if required, independent reviewers.


Commitment to Quality

IRSEF is dedicated to maintaining a fair, timely, and high-standard peer review process that supports scholarly excellence and contributes to the advancement of sustainable economics and finance research globally.