Policy Document

About EcoBiotics

EcoBiotics: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences (EJAPS) is an international journal focusing on the study of animal and plant sciences, ecology, and biodiversity. It publishes high-quality research that advances our understanding of life sciences and environmental sustainability. The journal welcomes articles on agriculture, genetics, ecosystems, and conservation practices. With a commitment to ecological balance, it highlights the importance of research in preserving natural resources. EJAPS serves as a platform for scientists, educators, and environmentalists to share discoveries that benefit both nature and society.


Aim & Scope

Aim / Objective

EcoBiotics is committed to:

  • Advancing knowledge in animal and plant sciences, ecology, and agriculture

  • Publishing high-quality research that supports biodiversity and sustainability

  • Promoting interdisciplinary collaboration among biologists, ecologists, and environmental scientists

  • Encouraging diverse perspectives in ecological and life science research

  • Supporting innovation and evidence-based practices for sustainable development

Scope

The scope of EcoBiotics covers a wide range of topics in biological and environmental sciences. It welcomes original research, reviews, and applied studies in (but not limited to):

  • Animal Sciences and Veterinary Studies

  • Plant Sciences and Botany

  • Agricultural Sciences

  • Genetics and Genomics

  • Microbiology and Biotechnology

  • Ecology and Ecosystem Studies

  • Biodiversity and Conservation

  • Environmental Science and Climate Change

  • Soil and Crop Sciences

  • Forestry and Natural Resource Management

  • Aquatic Biology and Fisheries

  • Entomology and Pest Management

  • Sustainable Farming Practices

  • Food Science and Nutrition

EcoBiotics provides a platform for both basic and applied research, promoting ecological balance, agricultural advancement, and sustainable development.


Open Access Policy

The EcoBiotics: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences (EJAPS) is a fully open-access journal, meaning all content is freely available to users and their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.  All published articles are immediately and permanently available online without subscription or access barriers.

All content is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.

Under CC BY 4.0, users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, share, adapt, and reuse the content for any lawful purpose, provided proper attribution is given to the original authors.

EJAPS does not impose any embargo period on published content.


Plagiarism Policy

Plagiarism Policy and Academic Integrity

The EcoBiotics: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences (EJAPS) is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity and ethical publishing. Plagiarism, in any form, undermines the credibility of scholarly work and is strictly prohibited. To ensure originality and maintain trust in academic communication, EJAPS enforces a strict zero-tolerance policy toward plagiarism.

Definition of Plagiarism

Plagiarism refers to the use of another individual’s ideas, words, data, images, or intellectual contributions without proper acknowledgment. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • Direct Copying: Reproducing text from any source without quotation marks and appropriate citation.

  • Paraphrasing: Rewriting another author’s work, ideas, or conclusions without proper credit.

  • Unacknowledged Use of Data: Using tables, figures, images, or datasets without proper referencing.

  • Self-Plagiarism: Reusing one’s own previously published or submitted work without disclosure or proper citation.

Plagiarism Threshold

  • EJAPS Standard: The similarity index of submitted manuscripts must not exceed 19% similarity index.

  • HEC Benchmark (Pakistan): While the Higher Education Commission permits up to 19% similarity, EJAPS adopts a stricter limit to promote academic excellence.

Detection and Prevention

  • Plagiarism Screening: All submissions are evaluated using recognized plagiarism detection software (e.g., Turnitin) prior to peer review.

  • Author Responsibility: Authors are fully responsible for ensuring that their work is original, properly cited, and free from any form of intellectual property violation.

Handling of Plagiarism

Type of Plagiarism Editorial Action
Minor (e.g., citation errors) Manuscript returned for correction and proper referencing.
Major (e.g., significant unattributed copying) Immediate rejection; if published, the article will be retracted.
Severe or Repeated Violations Authors may be blacklisted, and their institutions or funding bodies may be notified.

Author Declaration

All authors are required to submit a Statement of Originality, confirming that:

  • The manuscript is original and has not been published previously.

  • All sources have been properly cited.

  • The manuscript is not under consideration elsewhere.

Appeals Process

Authors who believe a plagiarism decision has been made in error may submit a formal appeal. All appeals are reviewed by the EJAPS Editorial Board, and decisions are made based on a fair and comprehensive evaluation.Transparency and Retraction Policy

In cases where plagiarism is confirmed after publication, EJAPS will issue a formal retraction notice clearly stating the reason for retraction. This ensures transparency and preserves the integrity of the scholarly record.

Use of AI-Generated Content

EJAPS strictly prohibits the use of AI-generated content (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, Bard, etc.) in any part of submitted manuscripts. Submissions must reflect original human scholarship and independent intellectual effort.

  • AI-generated or AI-assisted content is not permitted in the abstract, methodology, results, or discussion sections.

  • Manuscripts must contain 0% AI-generated content.

  • Violations of this policy will be treated as academic misconduct and may result in rejection or retraction.

EJAPS remains committed to ethical publishing practices and expects all contributors to adhere strictly to these standards.


Archiving Policy

EJAPS is committed to the long-term preservation and accessibility of published scholarly content.

Digital Preservation

The journal utilizes the PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN) and other preservation mechanisms available through the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform to ensure permanent accessibility of published articles.

Website Backup

Regular backups of journal data, articles, metadata, and system files are maintained to safeguard against accidental loss.

Persistent Access

Published content remains freely available and permanently accessible through the journal website.

Content Preservation

If the journal ceases publication, all published content will remain accessible through preservation services and institutional archives whenever possible.


Peer Review Policy

Overview

The EcoBiotics: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences (EJAPS) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic excellence, objectivity, and research integrity. All submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous, transparent, and ethical peer review process to ensure that only original, impactful, and methodologically sound research is published.

Review Model: Double-Blind Peer Review

To promote fairness and unbiased evaluationEJAPS employs a double-blind peer review system, where:

  • Author identities are concealed from reviewers

  • Reviewer identities are concealed from authors

This ensures that manuscripts are judged solely on scholarly merit, free from personal, institutional, or geographic bias.

Peer Review Workflow

1. Submission and Editorial Screening

All manuscripts must be submitted through the official EJAPS submission portal.

During the preliminary review, the editorial office assesses:

  • Relevance to EJAPS's scope (management, innovation, and social sciences)

  • Compliance with formatting and submission guidelines

  • Ethical approvals (if applicable)

  • Plagiarism check using Turnitin or equivalent tools

Submissions that do not meet these basic standards may be desk rejected without external review.

2. Reviewer Selection and Assignment

Manuscripts that pass initial screening are forwarded to at least two qualified reviewers, selected based on:

  • Subject area expertise

  • Research credentials and publication record

  • Absence of any conflict of interest with authors or affiliated institutions

3. Review Criteria

Reviewers are asked to evaluate manuscripts based on:

  • Originality and novelty of the research

  • Theoretical and practical contribution to the field

  • Clarity and structure of presentation

  • Soundness of methodology and data analysis

  • Literature grounding and reference use

  • Ethical compliance

They will submit one of the following recommendations:

  • Accept without revisions

  • Accept with minor revisions

  • Major revisions required

  • Reject

4. Editorial Decision

The handling editor reviews the recommendations and makes a final decision. If revisions are requested:

  • Authors receive consolidated feedback from reviewers

  • A timeline is provided for resubmission

  • Revised manuscripts may undergo further review if necessary

Review Timeline

The standard peer review process is completed within 4–6 weeks, depending on:

  • Reviewer availability

  • Manuscript complexity

  • Responsiveness to revision requests

Authors are encouraged to reply promptly to editorial communications to expedite publication.

Reviewer Ethics and Responsibilities

Selection Criteria

Reviewers are chosen based on their:

  • Subject expertise

  • Research contributions

  • Ethical integrity

  • International representation

Confidentiality

Reviewers are required to treat all manuscripts as strictly confidential. They must not:

  • Share or discuss manuscript content with others

  • Use unpublished data or ideas for personal advantage

Ethical Conduct

Reviewers are expected to:

  • Provide constructive, respectful, and unbiased feedback

  • Disclose any potential conflict of interest

  • Uphold professionalism in all communication

Appeals Process

Authors may submit a formal appeal if they believe a decision was made unfairly. Appeals will be:

  • Reviewed by the editorial board

  • May involve a third-party expert for re-evaluation

  • Final decisions are made by the Editor-in-Chief

Ethical Standards and Compliance

EJAPS follows the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and complies with the quality assurance protocols set by the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan.

Reviewer Recognition

To honor the valuable contributions of reviewers:

  • An annual acknowledgment list is published (with reviewer consent)

  • Certificates of appreciation are available upon request

Conclusion

Peer review is the cornerstone of quality assurance at EJAPS. Our double-blind, ethically sound, and academically rigorous process ensures the publication of research that is reliable, innovative, and impactful in the fields of management, innovation, and social sciences.


Copyright & Licensing Policy

Copyright Policy

The copyright policy of EJAPS is based on a non-exclusive publishing agreement, according to which the journal retains the right of first publication, but the author(s) are free to publish their work subsequently. The copyright of all work rests with the author(s).

Licensing Policy

All articles published by EJAPS are made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0  (CC BY 4.0).

Under CC BY 4.0, users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, share, adapt, and reuse the content for any lawful purpose, provided proper attribution is given to the original authors.


Repository Policy

Repository & Self-Archiving Policy

EJAPS  permits authors to deposit all versions of their work in institutional or other repositories like Research Gate, ORCID, Academia, ArXiv, etc.  without embargo, including:

  • Preprint (submitted version)

  • Author’s Accepted Manuscript (AAM)

  • Published Version (Version of Record)

Proper citation to the original published article is required.