Strategic Planning, Leadership, Resource Management, and Quality Assurance as Drivers of Institutional Performance in Higher Education: The Mediating Role of Academic Quality

Authors

  • Gulzar Mehar Ali M.Phil. in Education (Leadership and Management), Iqra University Author
  • Naheed Najmi Professor, Head, Department of Operative Dentistry, Liaquat College of Medicine and Dentistry Author
  • Samina Aziz MPhil scholar, College of Education, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Maheen Hashim Khan Burki Lecturer, Department of Physical Education & Sports Sciences, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Ayesha Jabbar Department of Psychology, University of Okara, Okara, Pakistan Author
  • Bilal Ahmad Qureshi Lecturer, Department of Sports Sciences, University of Sargodha, Pakistan Author
  • Asad Ullah Department of Educational Research & Assessment, University of Okara, Okara, 56300, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71317/jgst.2.6.2026.362

Keywords:

Strategic Planning, Leadership, Resource Management, Quality Assurance, Academic Quality, Institutional Performance, Higher Education

Abstract

Higher education institutions are increasingly pressured to enhance academic quality while improving institutional performance amid resource constraints, regulatory accountability, and rising stakeholder expectations. This study investigates the effects of strategic planning, leadership, resource management, and quality assurance on academic quality, as well as the specific indirect effects of these institutional capabilities on institutional performance via academic quality. Drawing on the Resource-Based View, a quantitative cross-sectional design was implemented with 350 academic and administrative personnel from public and private higher education institutions. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing six reflective constructs and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The measurement model demonstrated satisfactory indicator reliability, internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The structural model accounted for 62.4% of the variance in academic quality and 51.8% of the variance in institutional performance. Strategic planning (β = 0.214, p < 0.001), leadership (β = 0.267, p < 0.001), resource management (β = 0.158, p = 0.001), and quality assurance (β = 0.301, p < 0.001) were positively associated with academic quality. Academic quality, in turn, showed a strong positive relationship with institutional performance (β = 0.720, p < 0.001). Significant specific indirect effects were observed for strategic planning (β = 0.154, p < 0.001), leadership (β = 0.192, p < 0.001), resource management (β = 0.114, p = 0.002), and quality assurance (β = 0.217, p < 0.001) on institutional performance through academic quality. Quality assurance was identified as the strongest antecedent of academic quality and produced the largest indirect effect on institutional performance. These findings highlight academic quality as a key explanatory mechanism linking institutional management capabilities to broader institutional performance and emphasize the importance of integrating strategic planning, leadership, resource allocation, and quality assurance to support academic improvement.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Gulzar Mehar Ali, Naheed Najmi, Samina Aziz, Maheen Hashim Khan Burki, Ayesha Jabbar, Bilal Ahmad Qureshi, & Asad Ullah. (2026). Strategic Planning, Leadership, Resource Management, and Quality Assurance as Drivers of Institutional Performance in Higher Education: The Mediating Role of Academic Quality. Journal of Global Social Transformation, 2(6), 274-302. https://doi.org/10.71317/jgst.2.6.2026.362